The program shall present the results of the compliance calculations in a format similar to Table NA4-4 For each of the cases (8orientations times number of climates), the Time Dependent Valuation (TDV) energy for the Standard Design and the Proposed Design are shown (the energy features of the Proposed Design shall be the same for all orientations). The final column shows the compliance margin, which is the difference between the TDV energy for the Proposed Design and the Standard Design. Approved compliance programs shall scan the data presented in the Table NA4-4 format and prominently highlight the case that has the smallest compliance margin. Complete compliance documentation shall be submitted for the building and energy features that achieve compliance in all of the climate zones and orientations as represented by the case with the smallest margin. DSA may require that compliance documentation for other cases also be submitted; showing that the Proposed Design building and energy features are identical to the case submitted, in each orientation and climate zone. Table NA4-4 shows rows for climate zones 14, 15, and 16, which are the ones used when the criteria of Table 140.3-D in the Standards is used to show compliance throughout the state. If the criteria of Table 140.3-B in the Standards is used, then rows shall be added to the table for each climate zone for which the manufacturer wants the relocatable to be allowed to be installed.
|
|
TDV Energy | ||
Climate Zone |
Azimuth |
Proposed Design |
Standard Design |
Compliance Margin |
14 |
30 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
| |
120 |
|
|
| |
165 |
|
|
| |
210 |
|
|
| |
255 |
|
|
| |
300 |
|
|
| |
345 |
|
|
| |
15 |
30 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
| |
120 |
|
|
| |
165 |
|
|
| |
210 |
|
|
| |
255 |
|
|
| |
300 |
|
|
| |
345 |
|
|
| |
16 |
30 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
| |
120 |
|
|
| |
165 |
|
|
| |
210 |
|
|
| |
255 |
|
|
| |
300 |
|
|
| |
345 |
|
|
|